Translate

Jan 23, 2010

Enemy of Revisionism Leonard Zeskind discusses Mark Weber and Revisionism

 



 

Leonard Zeskind—a journalist and author of the book Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstreamreports that the Holocaust Denial industry in the United States has fallen on hard times:

Mark Weber, who has been the Institute for Historical Review's (IHR) leading personality for almost fifteen years, has admitted that, "there has been little success in convincing people that the familiar Holocaust story is defective." By "people" Weber obviously means people in addition to those who believe as a matter of ideological predisposition that the Holocaust was a hoax.  Among the reasons Weber cited for this failure films like Valkyrie and Defiance, which reminded audiences that the horror of the Nazi death machine was unquestionable.  Weber even admitted that at the war's end, "most of the Jews of Germany, Poland, the Netherlands and other countries were gone."Predictably, Weber has been lambasted by many of his former comrades…They have accused him of being lazy, failing to publish anything new or use the IHR website for anything more than news clippings. They have cited his failure to travel to Iran for a Holocaust denial conference at which Ahmadinejad spoke, and of ignoring growing market opportunities for Arab-language publications.  Several men, including the Frenchman Robert Faurisson and the American Friedrich "Fritz" Berg, challenged Weber's commitment to the belief that there were no gas chambers.  And a few intrepid souls, writing under pseudonyms on the web, ventured the guess that Mark Weber had been all along a spy or an agent for the Jews or somebody else considered unsavory.

If Weber is indeed a "spy," then he is covering it up quite nicely in a renewed focus on anti-Semitism, plain and simple.   And it is here that we come to understand that for Mark Weber and his ilk, so-called historical revisionism has never been about the history of the Holocaust, but has always been about finding a way to undermine and stigmatize Jews.

Weber writes that, "Some revisionists insist that … exposing the Holocaust as a hoax will deliver a shattering blow to Israel and Jewish-Zionist power." Alas, he says, this is not true, "debunking the Holocaust will not shatter that power."  Further, "In the real world struggle against Jewish-Zionist power, Holocaust revisionism has proved to be as much as a hindrance as a help."  Thus, Weber concludes, his Institute for Historical Review will focus on a more frankly anti-Semitic agenda.




--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton

In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."

On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.

The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.

This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.

The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.

This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_0_8?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=debating+the+holocaust&sprefix=DEBATING

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

No comments: