Translate

Jan 3, 2010

The last trial of John Demjanjuk

 


From: FRITZ BERG <hoaxbuster@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:42 PM


For a person like myself who has spent years studying the possibilities for mass murder with diesel exhaust at Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor as alleged for decades by many "holocaust scholars" such as Hilberg and Reitlinger, the latest trial of John Demjanjuk should be so interesting.

According to Reuters:  " In the Sobibor gas chambers, Jews died within 20 to 30 minutes after inhaling a toxic mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide,..."

    Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BK1N320091221

The latest and probably last trial of Demjanjuk in Munich, Germany is just another anti-German horror show to appease the victors from WW2, especially the Jews. Where one might expect some new insights into whatever happened at Sobibor, one gets essentially nothing because the mass extermination claims are devoid of any real evidence. The trial is merely another opportunity for pathological Jews to vent their hatred and lies. From the Reuters story linked above, one can not even tell whether the source of the deadly mixture of carbon monoxide and (now) carbon dioxide was a diesel engine, or a gasoline engine, or any kind of engine.

Consider what is missing about those mystery murder weapons--the most spectacular instruments of mass murder in all of human history. Who was the manufacturer of the engines? Was it Mercedes-Benz, or GM, or Ford, or all of the above? Imagine how profitable it would be for the Jews if they could only show, somehow, that the homicidal engines were made by any of the large corporations that are still out there today. Those corporations could be blackmailed and bled white for years. Such an opportunity!

How many cylinders did the engines have? When were they purchased, and installed, and by whom? Who serviced the engines? What kind of fuel was used? Are there any records at all for these murder weapons? Although there are some anecdotal statements made long after the war about the engines (by self-styled "eyewitnesses" who might themselves be tried for complicity), they are so contradictory that they are worthless even by the mindless standards of holocaustiography. Were the engines really from Soviet T-34 tanks as is sometimes claimed, or from Russian submarines as Eichmann seems to have claimed, or what? Surely, if the evidence really was overwhelming, we would know vastly more than we are told. We would know at least something.

But, why bother with questions about the engine? Everyone knows it happened! It is not any desire for historical truth or understanding (Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung) that motivates these prosecutors and judges. Their purpose is simply to make more anti-German, anti-Nazi propaganda to appease the Jews. Appeasing Hitler was evil—appeasing Jews is moral and good.  We must give the Jews everything they want--forever and ever.

There are no German documents showing that even one person was ever gassed in Sobibor, or anywhere else. There are no exhumed corpses with autopsies showing death from gas in Sobibor, or anywhere else. There is not even an extermination method that makes any forensic or technical sense.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!



--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton

In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."

On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.

The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.

This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.

The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.

This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_0_8?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=debating+the+holocaust&sprefix=DEBATING

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

No comments: