RePortersNoteBook.com: Reviews of Race and Immigration by Lasha Darkmoon, Tom Mysiewicz, John Spritzler, Margit Alm

Feb 15, 2010

Reviews of Race and Immigration by Lasha Darkmoon, Tom Mysiewicz, John Spritzler, Margit Alm

Here are some newest responses to Shamir's essay on Race and Immigration http://www.israelshamir.net/English/immigration.htm

(1) From Lasha Darkmoon:

Dear Mr Shamir,

I read your recent essay, The Poverty of Racialist Thought, with great interest. It is crackling with original ideas, many of them highly subversive, as one would expect from a controversial writer such as yourself! The main bone of contention between you and Kevin MacDonald is obviously multiculturalism. This is a subject I've alluded to only briefly and tangentially in my articles, while dealing mostly with other topics.

I have enormous respect for KMD, a man who is not only moved to pity by the plight of the Palestinians but who is also deeply concerned at the way his fellow-Americans are having their traditional culture subverted and alien values thrust upon them—values which, I think you will agree, are positively satanic: namely, contempt for Christianity, sexual perversion, mind pollution and mendacity in the media, the uglification of daily life, and the systematic demoralization of the masses.

I feel strongly, as I know you do, about the double standards involved in the fact that organized Jewry promotes multiculturalism in America while insisting that Israel should remain monocultural and Judeocentric. It's also of great concern that racial tensions between various ethnic groups in America should be deliberately ignited in order to distract and debilitate the different groups at the expense of the Master group, i.e., organized Jewry. It is considerations like these which undoubtedly exercise KMD's mind and the minds of all Americans who feel they are "losing their country."

To portray these beleaguered White Americans as "White Supremacists" or "racists" is, in my humble opinion, a low and dirty trick. As disgraceful as calling critics of racist, apartheid Israel with its black record of war crimes — men like Judge Goldstone — "anti-Semites".

I do believe with total sincerity, however, that the use of the word "White" is a tragic mistake — from a public relations viewpoint, if no other — and that this word should be avoided if possible. "This word 'WHITE' is the bugbear," I wrote to KMD a few months ago. "If only a less abrasive and more emollient equivalent could be found." You echoed my own sentiments when you said to me in a previous email: "Whites are indeed a misnomer and KMD should give thought how to change it. Christians? Logos believers? Let us give it a thought and share it with KMD."

I have racked my brains for a suitable alternative to "Whites", but have been unable to find one. I don't think "Christians" would satisfy KMD — a man whose vast erudition I respect enormously and whose sincerity and compassion are beyond question. It has to be clearly understood that KMD does not view this matter of multiculturalism, as you and E. Michael Jones do, through the prism of religion. His training as an evolutionary psychologist gives him an entirely different perspective. It's all about different races competing for resources in a cut-throat Darwinian environment.

Between the biological approach of KMD (genetics) and the metaphysical approach of E Michael Jones (Logos), there would appear to be an unbridgeable chasm.

A final word on KMD's position — a position I regard as entirely reasonable, because scientifically defensible. He believes that there are many meaningful commonalities between Europeans ["Whites"] at the genetic level. This is because they have similar genetic interests and a natural, instinctive solidarity in spite of their religious differences. That is to say, a European atheist and a European Christian have more in common ultimately than a European Christian and an African Christian. It follows from this that a marriage between a European atheist and a European Christian, which helps to produce children of pure European stock, is to be preferred to a marriage between a European Christian and an African Christian — a marriage that could only result in miscegnated children or "half breeds" — children who would not only be genetically removed from their parents but totally alien to their grandparents.

In an ideal world, Mr Shamir, all such children would turn out to resemble Dumas père or Pushkin. Proud to be what they are and uniquely valuable in God's variegated world. In the real world, however, they face many serious problems. If they were happy with their pigmentation, why the incessant and growing demand for skin-whiteners? Even in India there is color prejudice. Indeed, it is India that produces the best skin-whiteners and exports them all over the world. That tells you something.

There is also the delicate question of IQ. If the IQs of Whites and Blacks were equal, and if this could be adequately proved, there would be no problem. But if Whites are much smarter than Blacks, as is often alleged, then intermarriage can only result in a general diminution of IQ. When diversity entails a general deterioration of intelligence and culture, this surely has to be deplored. This "diversity" is celebrated in America by the Jew-controlled media but, curiously enough, is abominated in Israel. Losing one's racial identity is apparently good for Whites but bad for Jews. I have to say it: these double standards suck.

To give KMD his credit, he honestly believes that if we identify on the basis of religion, as E. Michael Jones does vis-à-vis his Catholicism, the White race will eventually be destroyed. I think KMD is right to be concerned that the race that gave us Dante and Shakespeare, Leonardo and Botticelli, Mozart and Beethoven, may soon become extinct as a result of malevolent immigration policies designed to serve the interests of one group and one group only: organized Jewry — the group you yourself castigate and criticize in veiled terms as "predators" and "the Masters of Discourse."

I'll conclude this critique by saying that this is an infinitely complex subject. I don't pretend to have all the answers. I see through a glass darkly, only too conscious of my intellectual limitations. You will therefore pardon me, I hope, if I've said anything foolish or inappropriate. I have no wish to offend anyone.

Kind regards and blessings,

Lasha Darkmoon.

(2) From Tom Mysiewicz

Israel Shamir is right to a large extent. Why do millions of Pakistani Muslims, for instance, want to flood into Greece and England? Especially considering the Greeks and British are not doing well. A sensible person would avoid antagonizing the locals unless this were a form of invasion (which it is) being aided and abetted by Shamir's former co-religionists. Economic and racial warfare directed at whites.

I work in the woods. Thousands of Laotians, Cambodians and illegal Mexican immigrants flood the areas I work in. They spy on me and steal my spots. They destroy the forest, litter, and work for about half of what I can--and I'm living in a 16-foot bathroomless trailer and driving a 20-year-old car. Many of them get refugee benefits, food stamps, free health care (I get none). Police and forest rangers give them no tickets or very few--a white person such as myself is crushed with fines for the smallest infraction. They drive newer-model vehicles. How do you think I feel about them?

A wise old Chinese woman who owned a motel once quoted us a price for a motel room that was more than we could afford. She got a very worried look on her face when she saw that she, an immigrant, owned a business and a native white with a family was living in the streets.

My advice to immigrants would be to fix up their own countries and immigrate to where they are welcome (if they must immigrate).

(3) From Margit Alm

So many wise and true words written in your two posts. Thank you for them. They will make excellent references when discussing the immigration and racism issues with other groups. I too reject the word "racism" and warn on mass immigration, the latter an issue that our government and opposition party are very keen on - without considering all the consequences.
Regards
Margit Alm, Melbourne, Australia

(4) From John Spritzler

Dear Israel,

I agree with your views on immigration and racism etc. but with one important exception. You write:

"...mass immigration should be slowed down to a trickle for reasons that have nothing to do with imaginary 'racism'. In order to achieve that, border controls are not enough. Economic aggression against Africa and Latin America should cease."

I take issue only with the "border controls are not enough" part. Let's use a metaphor to see why. You live in an apartment building (your nation) next to another apartment building (a foreign nation). You don't want all the people in the "foreign" apartment building to invade your building for shelter, for obvious reasons that have nothing to do with racism. Fine.

But the landlord of your building wants to raise the rent, and he figures that if the demand is higher people will be forced to pay the higher rent. But how to make the demand higher? Aha! Burn down the "foreign" apartment building ("economic aggression"). So he secretly does just that. The "foreigners" are homeless in the cold of winter and "invade" your apartment building to survive ("mass migration"). What should you do?

Option #1: Shoot the now-homeless residents of the foreign apartment building as they try to enter your apartment building ("border controls")?

Option #2: Let the homeless people live in your building but also join with them in criminally prosecuting the arsonist landlord and forcing him to pay for re-building the "foreign" apartment building ("making economic aggression cease") so the victims of the arson can, as no doubt most would desire, return to their country where their friends and families live and where people speak their language and share their customs?

I say no to Option #1 and yes to #2. We both say yes to Option #2, but do you really say yes to Option #1?

--John

Shamir replied:
shooting is rather extreme, eh? It is not done anywhere but between Mexico and the US.
But border controls? Yes. Immigration from threatened Iran and from undermined Mexico is exactly what the landlords want.

+++

The secret to happiness--is it good for the Jews?

"Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me on Jan. 24, 2010), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". --Michael Santomauro