Mondoweiss |
| Will liberal Zionists come around to BDS? Posted: 18 Apr 2010 09:46 AM PDT The divestment debate taking place at Berkeley is creating waves. It is not only helping to build diverse and powerful coalitions on campus, but it is also sparking conversations in places that have, at least to this point, been allergic to BDS. Jerry Haber has an important post over at his blog The Magnes Zionist appealing to liberal Zionists as to why they should give guarded support to the BDS movement. He lists 13 reasons, they are: 1. You already support two of the three central aims of the movement, which are
Where you may disagree is over:
But note that the phrase "as stipulated in UN resolution 194" weakens the statement since even Israel never rejected 194. And even if you don't recognize the right of return, you recognize the importance to the Palestinians of claiming that right. And haven't you have signed petitions with which you are not in complete agreement because you beiieve in the broader goal? There are many people who agree with you here who support the tactics of BDS. 2. You don't have to sign on to all of BDS. You don't like academic boycotts? Good, neither do I. You are nervous about calling for sanctions? Don't. But what about partial divestment from companies profiting from the Occupation as a symbolic and non-violent act of protest? What about boycotting settler's wine and other products? How can you be opposed to the Occupation and support the Occupiers. 3. You want to support non-violent Palestinian protest. BDS is first and foremost a Palestinian action. "If only," you have said countless times, "there were a Palestinian Gandhi or Nelson Mandella." Well, the tactics of BDS are the tactics of Gandhi and Mandella. Even if you are apprehensive about the aims of some of the movement, don't you understand how important it is to support non-violent protest? 4. There is no slippery slope here. If you support BDS today, you say to yourself, what will happen when it really gets up steam – perhaps you will be hurting Israel? Yet the chances of that happening are nill, and you know it. Who has the power? 5. BDS is becoming effective as a tactic. In the beginning it wasn't, and this is what kept me off the BDS wagon for a long time. And I am still not entirely on it. But successes recently have been impressive, both in their own right, and as a morale booster for the Palestinians. 6. If you oppose them you stand with AIPAC and the ZOA Sure, you may not like the rhetoric of some Palestinians and their allies. But you also don't like some of the rhetoric of the Jewish rightwingers. So who do you stand with on this one? The human rights folks -- or AIPAC and the Zionist Organization of America? Do you really want to hear the neocons crowing over their victory as they simultaneously demonize your ilk? 7. BDS actually strengthens the hand of the pro-peace camp in Israel. Israel is very sensitive to its public image. Whenever it is criticized, there are elements in Israeli society that point to Israel's loss of standing and argue that only a just and peaceful solution will stop the decline. This also answers the objection that it is unfair to single out Israel. And the people who makes this argument are always singling out Israel for preferential treatment. 8. BDS does not materially hurt the average Israelis I find it odd that many liberal Zionists who call for sanctions against Iran – a regime that is not engaged in the systematic deprivation of human rights to the extent that Israel is engaged – think that a cultural boycott or a divestment from certain American companies will hurt the average Israeli. The effect of the protest is symbolic; the message is what is important. 9. Other tactics have failed repeatedly. If you genuinely believe in a two-state solution, wouldn't it be good idea to see if BDS helps end the Occupation? Or are you one of those liberal Zionists who want a two-state solution In theory, but is pretty ineffectual about ending the Occupation. 10. Palestinians should have a little naches (pleasure) after all their suffering and BDS provides them with that. They don't have an army. They are not allowed by the world armed resistance. Where else, besides some world organizations, can they score victories? 11. You are appalled at the lies and disinformation of the anti-BDS movement. The BDS movement does not seek to destroy the state of Israel. BDS is not even anti-Zionist. Stop listening to the Big Lies. 12. Many Jewish and Israeli human rights activists support it. They are doing your job for you in Israel. They allow you to be hopeful about the state. Shouldn't you be listening to therm here? 13. You are sick up to here with the news coming out daily from Israel. Isn't it about time you gave back a little? There are consequences for their misdeeds. If you are unconvinced by the reasons above, but uneasy about circling the wagons with the likes of AIPAC, ZOA, Aish ha-Torah, etc. then you have another option: oppose BDS, but don't be strident about it. Don't rain on the Palestinian parade. Sit on the fence and wait, if you must. But don't fall on the side of AIPAC and ZOA. Related posts:
|
| Groundbreaking Chicago Hearing to Ask : Does US Policy on Israel/Palestine uphold our values? Posted: 17 Apr 2010 01:28 PM PDT Tomorrow the American Friends Service Committee in Chicago will hold a mock Congressional Hearing on US foreign policy in Israel/Palestine to look at the question - "Does US Policy on Israel/Palestine uphold our values?" The event will take place 1:30 - 5:30 p.m. Central Daylight Time (GMT -5) at the University of Chicago, but anyone can watch online at the website www.chicagohearing. Event organizer Jennifer Bing-Canar explained, "We hope this Hearing will bring the question of values into the discussion about US policy. The American people voted for "hope and change", and we see neither when it comes to US policy towards Israel and Palestine. It's critical that people around the world see that ordinary Americans -- as well as our elected officials -- care about the lives of people who are affected daily by US policies in the Middle East." There are already over 30 viewing events planned around the country to watch the live webcast including in Boston, New York, Detroit, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., to Indiana and Idaho, to Walla, Walla, Wash., and San Francisco. You can email contact@chicagohear The event, moderated by journalist Helena Cobban, will bring together witnesses from Israel/Palestine and the United States who will testify to the impact of U.S. foreign policy on property rights, freedom of movement, and military aid. Witnesses include: * Cindy Corrie, whose daughter Rachel was killed by an Israeli bulldozer while she tried to stop the demolition of a Palestinian family's home; * Amer Shurrab, a Palestinian peace activist from Gaza who will speak of his family's devastation during Israel's 2009 war in Gaza; * Jeff Halper, coordinator of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions; * Jad Isaac, an environmental expert and director of the Applied Research Institute, Jerusalem. A Listener Panel of Chicago-area religious leaders and academics will question the witnesses. Panelists include: * John Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of Chicago; * Cantor Michael Davis, member of the Jewish Fast for Gaza; * Ghada Talhami, professor emerita of politics at Lake Forest College; * Cotton Fite, associate priest at St. Luke's Episcopal Church, Evanston; * Barbara Ransby, associate professor of gender and women's studies, African American studies, and history at the University of Illinois at Chicago; * Zaher Sahloul, M.D., chairman of the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago. Related posts:
|
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@
http://www.Debating
Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton
No comments:
Post a Comment