Translate

Feb 9, 2011

Kevin MacDonald, Long Beach State Hate Professor, Claims Jews are Blocking Interview He Did With The Daily Show From Airing

 

Kevin MacDonald, Long Beach State Hate Professor, Claims Jews are Blocking Interview He Did With The Daily Show From Airing

Categories: The Hilarious Haters
Thumbnail image for kevinmacdonald.png
It's been a couple of months since we last paid much attention to Kevin MacDonald, the Long Beach State psychology professor who's an Irvine resident and a bigwig at the white-power, terrorist-inspiredAmerican Third Position Party. So we missed his January essay on the white-supremacistVdare.com publication in which he claims Jewish interests are keeping an interview The Daily Showdid with him last summer from ever airing.

MacDonald, of course, is the White weenie whose pseudo-academic writings claiming Jews systematically undermine Western civilization as a method of survival has won him praise in neo-Nazi circles and nowhere else.

In the essay (which people can find on their own because I'm sure as hell not going to drive more traffic to those imbeciles), MacDonald discloses that Jon Stewart's producers got in contact with him because they wanted to do a segment on his railings against then-Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagen. MacDonald had claimed that Kagen only received the nomination because she was a Jew, and the Daily Showflew MacDonald to New York to interview him. The highlight of MacDonald's interview, according to his piece? When he outed Ralph Lauren as a Jew.

Anyone who has heard MacDonald speak knows he's a bore with as much personality as a terra-cotta planter, and it's no surprise the segment never aired. But MacDonald, ever the conspiracy theorist, told his VDare audience he suspected more nefarious agents at work: the Jews!

"But the suspicion must be that," MacDonald whined, "the senior media honchos do not want discussions of race, White identity and interests, or Jewish influence in a way that gets outside the box of Political Correctness."

And who are these "senior media honchos," in MacDonald-speak? Jews.

The classless MacDonald also listed the private e-mail of a Daily Showproducer.

--


Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___

Let me take you to the Tahrir square( The Liberation Square)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: cherifo <anegyptian@cherifo.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 9, 2011 6:20 pm
Subject:  Let me take you to the Tahrir square( The Liberation Square)

 
At last in Tahrir square
Since the 25th of January when the people's revolution took place asking for the departure of Egypt's president Hosni Mubarak. Yesterday the 8th of February 2011, at last, I decided to go and visit the Tahrir square ( The liberation square).
With my camera in my hand, I took some pictures of what was happening.
I will take you with me around that important and famous square.
 
 
 
This is a bird's eye view of the Tahrir square.
At the upper right side you can see a short pink building, this is the Egyptian Museum, behind it, the tall building is the ( Ramses Hilton Hotel).
To the left of the pink Museum you can see a building with a black Facade, this was the building of Mubarak party, that was torched out, by the people who had enough with this party, the party who only two weeks ago forged the elections to its favor with 96%.
To the left of this torched building, was the Nile Hilton hotel overlooking the river Nile, who now have changed to the Nile Ritz hotel
The numbers you see on the Arial view, are the No.of spots from which I have taken the pictures you will see below.
 

 
 
Position No.1
 
To enter the Tahrir Square , I had to park my car far-away and walk crossing a bridge called Kasr El Nil Bridge
 
 
From that bridge, you can see to the right the (Ramses Hilton Hotel, and the torched Building ) I mentioned before.
 The second picture is the army controlling the entrance to the Tahrir Square.
 
 
After I passed the crowd, I stood shouting " Down wit Mubarak".
Behind me you can see the crowds who still are preparing to enter the Tahrir Square.
You can see the Bridge I mentioned, with the two columns with a Lion sitting at the base of each column
 

Position No.2
 
The crowd was very big and intense.
Every meter, you could see someone raising a banner that is self explanatory.
 
 

 
Position No.3
 
 
Me again, raising the Egyptian flag, In the middle of all sorts and kinds of huge crowds.
Behind me the ( R.I.P) banner, that means " Rest in Peace" for all the  revolutionary youngsters, who were killed on the 20 and 21st of January in cold blood by the police, who turned against the people in a very cruel and irresponsible way. 
 
Position No.4
 
 
All kind of chanting, all kind of banners

 
Position No.5
 
 
 
If you look back to the Arial view picture above, you can see hundred of  people holding over their heads a more than 30 meters long Egyptian flag, walking with it around the Tahrir Square.
 
 
With some fabrics, The people have made a kind of a wall on which they have displayed hundreds of posters and drawings that caricatured the president with all kind of notes and Jokes.
 
 
 
Amid the crowds, a group of young ladies sticking together, to express their reactions against the actual regime 
 
 

Position No.6
 
All kind of crowds, the rich and poor, the old and young, are filling the Tahrir square
 
 
 
Here some ladies and youngsters, are wrapping themselves with the Egyptian flag.
 
 
 
 
A young girl is leading the crowd to chant slogans that they repeated after her in a very ordered  way.
 
 

 
Position No.7
 
In these pictures you can see at the back ground, the Ex-Hilton Hotel at the left ,and the pink Egyptian Museum and Ramses Hilton at the right.
 
 
 
If you look above to the picture of the Arial view of the Square, you will notice many tents were build in the center of the Tahrir Square were the voluntary doctors, came with all sorts of medicines to help the wounded.
 

 
Position No.8
 
 
 
Standing under a very important Banner " People Demand Removal Of The Regime"
The crowds kept chanting in Arabic.
 
 
A foreign correspondent taking pictures, nobody bothering him, as some  Western countries have declared. 
 
 
 
Looking down you will see pictures of the youngsters who died during the uprising, among them a young girl.
 
 
A group of the demonstrators are praying asking God to change the face of Egypt in a better way.
 
 
 
 
Crossing the bridge again, on my way back to catch my car on the other side of the Nile.
 
 
 
May God save Egypt
 
Cherif
anegyptian
 
 
 

  



Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

"Zorba" composer: "I'm an anti-Semite but I love Jews."

 



'Zorba' composer declares himself an anti-Semite
February 9, 2011

ATHENS, Greece (JTA) -- Mikis Theodorakis, the Greek composer who wrote the music for the film "Zorba the Greek," said in a television interview that he is an "anti-Semite and anti-Zionist."

Theodorakis, 86, a hero in Greece, also said in the interview on Greece's High channel that "everything that happens today in the world has to do with the Zionists." He added that "American Jews are behind the world economic crisis that has hit Greece also."

The composer, a member of the Greek Communist Party for 60 years, once was a supporter of Israel but gradually became a major critic. He has gone from criticizing Israel to making anti-Semitic remarks and holding anti-Semitic positions.

In 2003, Theodorakis declared that "Jews are at the root of all evil." When the Greek Jewish community reacted strongly to his statement he apologized, but nothing really changed.

Oddly, during the television interview he said that "I'm an anti-Semite but I love Jews."

Theodorakis criticized Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou for meeting with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, who the composer says is a persona non-grata in Greece due to his "war crimes in Lebanon and Gaza."

In the interview, Theodorakis had a warning for the Greek people.

"We are in danger. In a few days the Zionists will gather in Greece for a conference," he said, referring to the visit by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, which began Tuesday.

+++


Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Egypt's "revolution": By David Turner on 9 February, 2011

 

Egypt's "revolution" will take its course and hopefully with a minimum of cost in lives and suffering. The likely outcome will be a continuation of the past, with a new face at the helm. The major change, I suspect, lies outside of Egypt, in the United States. It's zig-zag response to the unfolding situation clearly expresses a confusion of priorities, of strategic interests. And the result will be an escalating loss of confidence in America's credibility and ability, a further decline in American influence: an already unstable region of the world will grow yet more unstable. 

I suggest in this article that America's old nemesis in the region and the world, Russia, will be the immediate beneficiary, will be inheritor of the region. Other repercussions will follow. For those you will have to read the article.

David

Text Box:

Antisemitism and Jewish Survival

 

 


The Middle East after America

 

"There is always the possibility that the United States will awake in the morning and see its way clear of ideology to its regional and strategic interests. But failing that, whoever replacesAmerica in this volatile region will find alliance with Israel, a stable democracy with a powerful military, important as its 'forward line of defense.'"

 

 

President Obama exuded confidence when he had his press secretary suggest that President Mubarak leave "immediately, and that means yesterday!" He was confident when he decided that democratic elections whose outcome would be fair and achieve stability was possible "even before" the constitutional date for elections in September. And he is confident in suggesting the possible inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood in a democratic government, even though anti-American, anti-Israel, because it has relatively little support at the polls. Very likely Jimmy Carter was equally confident in 1979 in his support of the student protesters in the streets of Teheran. That president also turned his back on its hapless ally of that day, the shah. Carter was likely also confident that the Islamists could be included in a democratic government because, as in 2011, they were believed too electorally weak in 1979 to affect events on the ground.

 

George W. Bush was always confident, as when he chose to replace Sadam's tyranny with a democracy to be the model for the region. Today his Shiite-controlled democracy is increasingly under the sway of its Shiite neighbor to the east, Iran, an alliance that threatens America's strategic interests in the Arabian Peninsula and the Sunni Arab world, a region where little threat existed before the American intervention.

 

Even following that debacle Bush set out three years later to introduce democracy inPalestine. Dismissing warnings by President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert that including the still armed, anti-government Hamas in those elections would likely result in their victory, Bush insisted that "democratic" elections had to include the Islamists. Hamas won. Bush responded by a Fateh coup to overthrow the democratically-elected Hamas government, but that also failed.

 

And today President Obama confidently welcomes the prospect of a democraticEgypt in which the Muslim Brotherhood "cannot" create possibly a theocracy because, like the ayatollahs of Iran in '79, they don't have majority support at the polls!

 

American crisis management over the past weeks of Egyptian protests raises questions not only regarding judgment by the present administration, but of American policy in the Middle East. Setting aside the blow to Egyptian prestige resulting fromAmerica "ordering" the president of Egypt to step down, how understand a policy thrust that not only abandons a long-time and trusted ally, but sides with those calling for his downfall? Do the administration and its "expert" advisers not understand the implications of their actions?

 

The US response to the Cairo protesters can partly be laid at the feet of our inexperienced and over-confidant president. But that is only part of the problem. The parallel between the American response to Cairo and Teheran, separated by more that thirty years, suggests an long-standing national policy. In Egypt, as in Iran, sympathy towards the street took precedence over strategic regional considerations. And in both instances, and actions in between, the result was opposite that hoped for.

 

1978-9, Iran: Within months of the revolution the "democratic aspirations" of the students were replaced by a theocratic counter revolution by Islamists previously considered by American policy makers to be friendly towards the United States, and electorally marginal. And those students who overthrew America's previous ally, the shah, were themselves eliminated by the new regime.  

 

2003, Iraq: President Bush ignored the warnings of the CIA and Israeli and Saudi intelligence that attacking Iraq would create a military vacuum that would leave the Arab world at risk from Iran. But, according to the president, "[i]t is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world." Bush chose to set Iraq free, to replace tyranny with democracy. Good intentions, but again, lousy outcome.

2008, Palestine: Once again Bush chose to ignore the warnings of leaders on the ground and insisted on full and fair elections, including Muslim Brotherhood offshoot Hamas. "After failing to anticipate Hamas's victory over Fatah… the White House… backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan… leaving Hamas stronger than ever."

2008, Washington, DC: Several days into the protests working themselves out on the streets of Cairo today, the London Daily Telegraph disclosed that in 2008 the Bush Administration recruited an Egyptian student leader with the intention of deposing President Mubarak (see State Department memo). With or without awareness of the Bush Administration's provocateur-in-place, three years later the Obama White House sought the same outcome.

So there is a clear American policy stream at work today on the streets of Egypt. The question is not whether ideology (the spread of democracy) or morality (siding with those perceived to be oppressed) should or not play a part in American foreign policy, it should; the real question is whether ideology should trump other, strategic interests. Obama's expressed disloyalty, his disrespect of the Egyptian president may or not have won points with Egyptian students camped out in Tahrir Square; it certainly would not have reassured other regional heads of state.

 

If 1979 did not represent the beginning of the end for America's Middle East "century" then 2003 had to be the tipping point. And 2011 likely is the beginning of the end.

 

In mid-20th century the United States and Russia were locked in struggle for supremacy in the Middle EastIsrael was a key participant in that struggle, a distraction to Russia-backed Egyptian and Syrian ambitions in the oil-rich monarchies of the Arabian Peninsula. Since the fall of the Soviet Union Russia has made a quiet comeback in the region. As supporter of Iran, if and when the US finally retreatsRussia will be present to take its place, to finally achieve its centuries-long ambition of a "warm water port" in the Mediterranean. And when that happens not only will the US have lost the strategic Middle East with its oil, the Suez Canal, land bridge dividing north/south and east/west, but it will also lose its European allies as well. Because a Europe flanked south and north by a resurgent Russia will not be long in accepting reality.

 

2011, Israel: The eight years between Iraq and Egypt have been traumatic for the region; America's distraction by two lost wars, its declining influence grows increasingly obvious daily. Israel could likely prevail over Iran and her allies in war today. But for how long could Israel depend on the United States, constantly for military and diplomatic support; how long would the increasingly isolationist giant even need a "forward line of defense" to protect its diminishing national interests?

 

There are indications that Israeli leaders are coming to terms with the problem. Israelis reaching out to regional and outside emerging states, to India and China (the next generation "superpower").

 

More locally, Turkey early recognized the American decline, and is several years ahead of Israel in coming to terms with that reality: her shift from west to east, her distancing from the US and Israel is evidence of this. Israel partially replaced the loss by aligning with Greece. But Greece is a doorway to Europe, not Arabia, and the west was always, at best, an iffy ally.

 

To the south of Egypt southern Sudan recently voted secession; and press reports describe Israel as critical in providing the military and logistical support that made the election possible. That emerging country's leadership are expressing gratitude and fraternity with Israel, the possibility of an alliance south of Egypt, across the waterway from the Arabian Peninsula.   

 

But Israel's main priority is, must be, a replacement global partner for the declining America-Israel "special relationship."  If Russia succeeds the United States as regional power Israel would likely represent the same advantages to the new superpower as for the old; a strategic counter-balance to radical and destabilizing regional actors.

 

Of course there is always the possibility that the United States will awake in the morning and see its way clear of ideology to its regional strategic interests. But failing that, whoever replaces America in this volatile region will find alliance with Israel, a stable democracy with a powerful military, important as its "forward line of defense."

 

 

Other of my writings on this and other topics may be read at my other blog sites, Israel, the Diaspora and Jewish Denial, and at Antisemitism and Jewish Survival.

 

+++

Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

"Ultra-Orthodox Defend Right to Kill Gentiles" - by Rev. Ted Pike

 




ULTRA-ORTHODOX DEFEND RIGHT TO KILL GENTILES

By Rev. Ted Pike
9 Feb 11

In the past two weeks, two more Palestinians have been murdered by Ultra-Orthodox settlers. (See Haaretz articles: "Palestinians: Rock-throwing teen shot dead by West Bank settlers" and "Palestinian killed after settlers open fire in West Bank village") Now "a senior figure in religious Zionism," Rabbi Dov Lior, chief rabbi of Arba, is being sought by police for questioning. Dov Lior publicly agrees with the controversial book The King's Torah, that Jews have the right to kill Gentiles.

The rabbi refuses to report to police headquarters, saying he "will not take part in the dishonoring of the Torah." Two thousand of his supporters gathered around his home Tuesday, barring police from serving the warrant.  Haaretz reports that Knesset member Michael Ben-Ari also supports the rabbi and calls the warrant a travesty.  "This is a regime of fear…The issuance of an arrest warrant against a great Torah figure of such magnitude, when all this is about is the backing he gave to a book, is a crossing of a red line, McCarthyism…" he said.

Actually, this is just mild unpleasantness between the Israeli government and Ultra-Orthodox Jews who interpret the Talmud and Zohar (Kabala) literally—as the Pharisees who wrote these books intended. The government also venerates the Talmud. But it must appear to protect the rights of Palestinians and Arabs in the Occupied Territories. That isn't made easier by the facts that Israel's chief rabbinate is now largely controlled by Ultra-Orthodox or that Orthodoxy is the official religion of Israel.   

How intent is the government on prosecution of Lior?  As could be expected, the case againstRabbi (and former MK) Yaakov Yosef, who coauthored The King's Torah and was arrested in January 2010, was thrown out because of "incorrect procedures" by the police.

For much more background on this developing conflict, read my article, "The Complete Guide for Killing Gentiles."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.


NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
www.truthtellers.org


--


Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___