Translate

Mar 14, 2011

Our Rachel Corrie, by Lasha Darkmoon

 

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/03/our-rachel/

OUR RACHEL

By Lasha Darkmoon

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD1.png


For Patrick Willis, a true lover of Palestine, who decided to take a Rachel poem of mine and turn it into a moving new video: In Memory of Rachel Corrie. It is hoped that the essay presented below will serve as an introduction to this widely acclaimed video as well as a tribute to Rachel on the 8th anniversary of her death on March 16.

She was called "St. Pancake" by her killers soon after her death. It was a term of derision for a young woman determined to make a martyr of herself. She had gotten herself pancaked. Flattened. Crushed beneath the blades of a bulldozer while giving succor to terrorists.

In the words of Zionist professor Steven Plaut, Rachel is "a sort of Mother Teresa for the radical left and apologists of Islamofascism. She is a martyr-saint for the pro-terror lobby."

16 March will mark the 8th anniversary of Rachel's death. It's a good time to remember her and ask ourselves what she died for. Are the Palestinians any nearer to achieving their dreams of an independent state? Are those who killed Rachel in a stronger or weaker position than they were eight years ago?

There are two versions to every major news story that comes out of Israel: the Zionist version and the non-Zionist one. These narratives never agree. They are mutually incompatible. One is the "right" version, the kosher and politically correct one advanced by organized Jewry and its hasbara agents in the mainstream media. The other is the "wrong" version, the one touted by "anti-Semites" and "conspiracy theorists".

Rachel seen through Zionist eyes

According to the Zionist worldview, Rachel Corrie was

a clueless flag-burning undergraduate from Evergreen State College in Washington. Urged on by her radical professors, she decided to join the missions organized by the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). She and her comrades were sent off to the "occupied territories" to assist Palestinian terrorist groups. (See here)

Having arrived in Gaza in January, 2003, age 23, the budding terrorist had immediately been given a crash course by the ISM in how to be a thorn in the flesh to Israel. She lived among the Palestinians in Gaza, eating their food and imbibing their false values and skewed views of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Needlessly concerned about the "illegal occupation" of Palestine in the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria, all one hundred per cent Jewish by divine mandate, this dangerous fanatic seemed to be unaware that the Arabs had been squatters on Jewish land since the 13th century; and that this land, Greater Israel, stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Here is Zionist pundit Denis Prager, telling us how unspeakably evil and misguided Rachel was:

Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. [Emphasis in original]. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce.

We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic—as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil—the Nazi, the communist, the Islamic terrorist—is idealistic.

We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a "peace activist." So let it be said once and for all that most of these people are moral frauds. Why? Because "peace activists" routinely protest only against peaceful countries. [They] only target peace-loving Israel and America.

Rachel Corrie and the millions marching to protect Saddam Hussein's Iraq have never uttered a peep against Palestinian terror, Iraqi totalitarianism or North Korean gulags. Instead, they focus their animosity at the countries that confront these evils—the United States and Israel.

Grieve for Rachel Corrie's parents, but spare us the hagiography. Rachel Corrie died fighting for the International Solidarity Movement, a Palestinian group dedicated—in its own words—to "armed struggle" against Israel. She ended up being a useful idiot for, and one more victim of, Palestinian terror. (See here)

On 16 March 2003, this useful idiot went too far. For two hours, she kept interfering with the work of an Israeli  bulldozer trying to demolish a Palestinian doctor's home; a doctor with terrorist sympathies whose house had tunnels built under it, through which food, medical supplies and arms were being smuggled to give aid and sustenance to "filthy Arabs"—one million of whom, as we are reliably informed by respected rabbis, "are not worth a Jewish fingernail".

She kept on getting in the way of the good Jewish driver, taunting him through a bullhorn and skipping from mound to mound of earth in her hateful fluorescent orange jacket, making it impossible for him to kill her and pretend he hadn't seen her.

She was certainly asking for it.

Here is Steven Plaut again, Associate Professor of Business Studies at Haifa University, offering his condolences to Rachel's parents after the tragic death of their daughter:

Welcome to Haifa, Mr and Mrs Corrie….Your daughter was in a war zone as a belligerent, on behalf of a movement of Arab fascists seeking to destroy Israel and murder as many Jews as possible. Your daughter died while interfering with an anti-terror operation carried out by soldiers in a land in which she had no business being at all….The Jews have been battling Arab fascism and genocidal terrorism for a hundred years, before, during, and after the Nazi Holocaust of six million Jews. Your daughter was helping those who perpetrate Nazi-like atrocities against randomly selected Jews….Your daughter has become a symbol for dangerous foolhardiness. She essentially committed suicide as an empty gesture to assist murderers and terrorists. (See here)

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD2.png

"Martyr, idiot, dedicated, deluded. Why did this American college student crushed by an Israeli bulldozer put her life on the line? And did it matter?" —Joshua Hammer, caption to a picture of Rachel in The Death of Rachel Corrie. (Mother Jones, 9/2003: http://motherjones.com/politics/2003/09/death-rachel-corrie

Rachel seen through non-Zionist eyes

Let's cut to the chase now. Having described the politically correct version of Rachel's death, the one insisted on by organized Jewry and the mainstream media, let's consider the politically incorrect version now, if only in the interests of balance.

Here is Alison Weir, a well-respected authority on Palestine. Having read scores of different accounts of Rachel's death, including every single eyewitness report, this is Weir's beautifully succinct summation:

On March 16th, 2003, an Israeli soldier driving a bulldozer two-stories high crushed to death 23-year-old Rachel Corrie, an American nonviolent human rights protester. According to numerous witnesses and photographic documentation, she was killed intentionally.

Rachel and a handful of others practicing Gandhian nonviolence in the Gaza Strip had been pleading with Israeli soldiers for two hours not to destroy a Palestinian family home. Suddenly, the Israeli bulldozer operator began driving his giant bulldozer toward the home, Rachel sitting in the bulldozer's path. Witnesses report that she then stood up on the mound of debris and dirt pushed by the bulldozer blade and looked straight at the operator through the window. He continued, and she was pulled underneath the tractor, its blade crushing her. He then backed up, running over her again, burying her deeper into the dirt. (My emphasis, see here).

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD3.png

Weir concludes her account of Rachel's death:

Her friends ran to her screaming. They dug her out of the dirt. One told me that Rachel's eyes were open; her last words were, "My back is broken." (See here)

The day after Rachel's death there was a memorial service for her in Gaza. Many Palestinians attended this service, the men's faces etched with silent grief, the women's eyes streaming tears. Here was a lovely American girl in the full flower of her youth who had died for Palestine.

Not to be excluded, the Israelis decided to attend Rachel's memorial service too. To mock and gloat. The same bulldozer that had killed her was sent in to disrupt the ceremony. And this it did.

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD4.png

"The bulldozer that killed her drove slowly, exultantly past…" (Alison Weir)

Rachel's Death: Its larger significance

Let's now attempt to set the tragedy of Rachel Corrie within a wider context.

Clearly the death of this iconic figure was a public relations disaster for Israel. The effect of decades of Holocaust propaganda must have unravelled in a single instant. You bastards, you killed our Rachel! This must have been the thought uppermost in the minds of millions of Americans on hearing the tragic news of Rachel's death. The ability to squeeze tears from non-Jewish eyes for Jewish suffering must have suffered a serious setback at this point. Why should we mourn your dead at Auschwitz when you killed our beautiful Rachel?

I confess, bad Christian that I am, that unkind thoughts such as these assailed me on the day I first heard that Rachel's life had been snuffed out in the Holy Land. To put it mildly, the manner of her death did not increase my respect for Israel or enhance my capacity for shedding tears for Anne Frank.

I found myself buying a candle for Rachel and lighting it before a side altar in the Benedictine abbey near my home, offering up this prayer: "Lord Jesus Christ, protector of the weak, let Israel come to a speedy and peaceful end and the Jews be sent on their travels again—back to the countries where they belong!"

I shouldn't have said that. But this is how I felt. And now that I've confessed it, I feel better.

Consider now these significant facts:

Rachel was killed on March 16, 2003, exactly four days before the beginning of the Iraq War. Ariel Sharon, already guilty of war crimes (Sabra and Shatila massacres, 1982) was Prime Minister of Israel at that time. He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. "We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!" he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

America said nothing on that occasion. It swallowed the insult.

Sharon must have known, on the day of Rachel's death, that the Americans were getting geared up for their attack on Iraq four days later. They would have other more important things on their minds than the death of an obscure peace activist in Gaza. Sharon was on a roll. There is little doubt that the killing of Rachel received the green light from the Butcher of Sabra and Shatila himself.

Having spent two hours trying to demolish a house with Rachel constantly getting in his way, the bulldozer driver must have phoned for instructions from headquarters. Admittedly, this is pure speculation. The directive must have come back—so I imagine—"Kill her!" A salutary lesson needed to be set. The ISM peace activists had to be taught a stern lesson that Israel was not to be trifled with. If you throw yourself in front of a bulldozer, you can expect to get run over.

There is additional support for the hypothesis that Rachel's death was a state-sanctioned act of premeditated murder. What "additional support"? Well, the fact that the same policy of reckless disregard for the lives of ISM peace activists was to continue unchecked in the immediate aftermath of Rachel's death.

On April 5, a mere three weeks after Rachel's death, peace activist Brian Avery was shot in the face by IDF forces and severely disfigured. Six days after that, on April 11, it was another peace activist's turn. British ISM volunteer Tom Hurndall was shot in the head by an IDF soldier and left clinically brain dead, dying nine months later.

Many similar incidents followed, demonstrating that the bad publicity resulting from Rachel's death had done nothing to galvanize Israel into taking remedial steps to improve its image.

I need mention only a few names: Tristan Anderson (American), Emily Henochowicz (Jewish-American), Tove Johansson (Swedish), Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Maguire (Irish). I leave it to the reader's imagination to picture the horrific injuries often sustained by Israel's many victims: blindness, brain damage, disfigurement, mutilation, paraplegia, pain.

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD5.png

Tove Johansson, Swedish human rights activist, whose face was badly disfigured by an Israeli settler. Her crime? Helping Palestinian children get safely to school. About a hundred settlers gathered to jeer and spit at her and other peace activists with the chant: "We killed Jesus! We'll kill you too!"

 

Facts and Figures

The number of foreigners killed and injured in Israel are a mere miniscule fraction of the number of Palestinians put through the mad mangle. More than 45,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel within the last ten years. Countless more have been injured.

Consider these horrific statistics: between four and five Palestinian children have been killed on average every week for the last ten years by Israeli forces, more than one every second day. (Based on figures found here).

Despite the fact that Israel has violated 65 UN resolutions, the US government continues to give this parasitic pariah state $8.2 million per day. Total "direct" aid to Israel has been conservatively estimated at $140 billion. It is interesting to note that, when indirect aid is added to this enormous sum, the total cost to the American taxpayer is a staggering $3 trillion — the identical amount, by the way, that Rabbi Dov Zakheim managed to "lose" or "misplace" when he was Chief Financial Officer at the Pentagon a few years ago.

If you're wondering what $3 trillion looks like, imagine a stack of $100 bills piled up to 340 times the altitude of Mt Everest—or a money tower of $100 bills 3037 miles tall. (Based on figures found here and here).

Conflicting Stories: Who is lying?

As I mentioned earlier, there are always two sides to any question involving the state of Israel. There is the non-Zionist (or anti-Zionist) narrative which is usually harsh and condemnatory, accusing Israel of bad behaviour, and there is the Zionist narrative which is invariably self-exculpatory and seeks to present Israel as spotlessly innocent. We have seen this drama enacted repeatedly. There is little new here.

There was the USS Liberty incident in 1967, for example. (Here is a survivor's detailed eyewitness account). On that occasion, a United States Navy research ship, USS Liberty, moving through international waters, was attacked by the Israeli Air force and Israeli Navy torpedo boats. Thirty-four American crew members were killed and 170 injured. There is more than enough evidence to show that this was a false flag act of terrorism committed by Israel against America.

As one might have expected, the Israelis claimed it was all a tragic accident, and the US government was happy to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Only last summer, there was the Gaza flotilla incident in which Israeli paratroopers attacked six ships in international waters on their way to Gaza on a humanitarian mission. Nine peace activists, mostly Turkish, were killed, and about fifty injured. On this occasion, turning logic on its head, the Israelis claimed they had been acting in self-defense when their own unprovoked violence had produced the inevitable resistance. (See here)

As usual, two conflicting accounts: the Israeli version and the world's version.

Perhaps the most striking example of these polarities of viewpoint can be seen in the case of the Gaza War that took place in the winter of 2008-9 ('Operation Cast Lead'). This led to massive disproportionate casualties on the Palestinian side, amounting to a massacre—a ratio of over 100 to 1 killed—together with the almost complete destruction of Gaza's infrastructure; and it was concluded later, after an international  investigation led by Judge Richard Goldstone, himself a Zionist Jew, that Israel had been guilty of serious war crimes.

Despite these findings by a panel of world-renowned legal experts, Israel was to be let off the hook completely. It investigated itself and found that its behavior had been irreproachable. The AIPAC-enthralled American government reached a similar conclusion. Many neoconservatives went even further and suggested that the only "criminal" here was Judge Goldstone himself, an incorrigible anti-Semite and Hamas sympathizer!

What Israel says, our media repeat. What Israel demands, our government gives. What Israel wants, its well-greased lobby delivers. — Alison Weir, We Won't Forget Rachel Corrie

So much for truth and justice in an Alice in Wonderland world turned upside down.

We won't forget

Poor Rachel! What did you die for? Who is there to mourn you now except the Palestinians and those who love Palestine?

We shall not forget you, Rachel. We shall carry you in our hearts like a hidden flame. In your lovely innocence and idealism, you will remain to us always the perfect symbol of our people—and a reminder of what awaits us all in the days of tribulation to come.

Amnesty International condemned the killing of Rachel in the most emphatic terms. She is our role model, our icon, our symbol of sacrifice. Neither Israel nor its American backer paid the slightest attention.

Christian Bustany, Amnesty International's US representative, lamented the fact that our dear Rachel, the flower of our race, had been so callously killed and nothing done about it.

As Rachel Corrie was an American citizen, the US government has a particular responsibility to ensure thorough, proper and impartial investigation of her death. US-made bulldozers have been 'weaponized'. Their transfer to Israel must be suspended.

The killer bulldozers are still shipped out to Israel in vast numbers, courtesy of the American taxpayer, demolishing houses every day, uprooting olive trees, and running amok amid a terrified people.

The day after Rachel's death, Israeli forces killed nine Palestinians, including three children.

It was business as usual.

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD6.png

Young Rachel…looking forward to life

 

http://www.rebelnews.org/images/stories/201102/713129/LD7.png

Rachel's last words: "My back is broken."

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic, age 32, with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a published poet and translator whose verse can be sampled here. "Lasha Darkmoon" is a pen name.

Source: Occidental Observer


 




--


Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Spontaneous Evolution .... book recommendation

 

From: <heinzhb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:06 PM

From another group list:

As part of my recovery from chemo and surgery, I've had some extra time do some reading. I purposely picked books that I though were spiritual in nature and uplifting! So, it was a bit of a surprise when, while reading a most excellent book: "Spontaneous Evolution, Our Positive Future and A Way to Get There from Here", I found that authors Bruce Lipton and Steve Bhaerman have this to say on pg 70:

"As we explore the rise and fall of paradigms along the path of human evolution, it's important to remember that history ultimately belongs to those who write and interpret it and that interpretations tend to corresponds with the notions of those doing the interpreting, Consequently, we must be aware that in addition to parts of story being incorrectly recorded, many interesting and accurate events are often conveniently omitted because their truth didn't fit with the story line that the current 'official' truth provider was presenting"

Now, as all revisionist everywhere know, it's like, duh! This should be obvious to one and all and becomes most glaring when applied to the World Wars, including the ones we're fighting now.

However, I am also amazed at what the authors have to say about Globalization, Health Care and big Pharma! They're spot on. Of course, they do give hope to our evolving as a society but it's going to take a lot of 'sane thinking', the old paradigms must go!

read this book when you can ;)



--


Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Re: Weber /IHR

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Ostara <ostara18@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:28 PM
Subject: Weber /IHR


Michael,

Word is that lazy, spineless, toad Mark Weber has been given the boot
from his Foundain Valley quarters effective June 2011. He is
scrambling around trying to find a new location..,

Couldn't happen to a nicer worm !



--


Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Orthodox Jewish prayer ritual spooks Alaska Airlines flight attendants; crew locks down cockpit

 

March 14, 2011



Ezekiel12

9:12:55 AM
Mar 14, 2011

Alyssa1982 says: "After reading this article and these comments its clear how little Americans know about Jewish life. Firstly saying the morning prayers is the obligation of every adult male and we don't care where we are or how much it creeps you out." And there you have it, folks. A completely selfish and uncaring attitude from a defender of this faith. She does not care how this impacts others. I guess this sums up why some Orthodox Jews attempt to tell non-Jews how they should dress, what they should eat and what side of the street they are supposed to walk on in certain Brooklyn neighborhoods. There is nothing wrong with worshipping as you please. But one should take into consideration how certain aspects of your worship looks to others. To fail to do so invites not only suspicion, but intolerance.




Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___

Chapter IX: 1980s: Wiesel Becomes America’s Holocaust High Priest

 

Memo: From a new book I will publish this summer. The professor who wrote the book will use his REAL name. -- Michael Santomauro


Chapter IX: 1980s: Wiesel Becomes America's Holocaust High Priest


Random excerpt:


When Congress unanimously established the Holocaust Council, it made no mention of the fact that the revisionist threat was one of the main reasons for the creation of both the "Museum" and the "Days of Remembrance." Once the legislation had been enacted and signed by President Carter, the mask came off. In the Council's meeting in New York on December 10, 1980, Wiesel made it clear that he perceived Holocaust revisionism to be a grave threat both to himself and to the Jewish Holocaust narrative as a whole. He told the members of the Council that "the denial of the Holocaust is a very serious problem. As some of you may know, I was probably the first to alert the American Jewish community to that danger. In the beginning there were only a few articles and two or three books, and nobody listened.  Then I said: 'You know, there are already ten books.' Somewhat later I said: 'There are already twenty-four books.' Year after year, the number has increased. The problem has finally caught up with us. I must say that I feel impure when I touch these books. I don't know what to do.  Debate them?  I would not dignify them with a debate. I would not dignify them with a dialogue." Wiesel then asked in his still wobbly English: "What should be done with them. To ignore them?  I do not know how. We cannot. The best thing to do is what we are doing: to write more books, to speak more about the Holocaust in more authentic voice." In other words, since 1980, unable to answer the revisionists, Wiesel, the museum authorities and the Zionist media have simply turned up the volume on their one-sided and propagandistic presentation of the Holocaust.  

 

1980: Another Blow to "the Holocaust:" Serge Klarsfeld Publishes the Auschwitz Album

 

    As the U. S. Holocaust Memorial Museum was coming into being, Serge Klarsfeld, who was still a rather obscure French lawyer and Jewish Holocaustian activist, published the so-calledAuschwitz Album, which is also known as the Lili Jacob Album, after the name of the Jewish deportee who discovered it. It is also important to remember that she did not find it at Auschwitz-Birkenau, but at the Dora-Mittelbau camp in south central Germany. The fact that Jacob had suppressed the album from 1945 until 1980, when she donated it to the Yad Vashem Museum in Israel, speaks volumes about what the pictures really show: that there was no Holocaust at Auschwitz-Birkenau. But with the rise of revisionism in the 1970s, Klarsfeld apparently thought that by publishing the pictures, often misleadingly captioned, he could use it as a weapon against the revisionists. Lili Jacob had suppressed these pictures for over three decades because they exposed to ridicule the utter mendacity of the Jewish "survivors." In fact, anyone who looks at them with a critical eye today cannot help but conclude that they do indeed document the fact that there was no Holocaust at the Birkenau camp. But by the time Klarsfeld and the Holocaustians took over the pictures in 1980, the Orwellian world in which we live - a world in which up is down, black is white and peace is war - had evolved to such an extent that these pictures could be published with highly deceptive captions with the certainty that no official historian or other recognized expert would dare to publicly question the outrageous lies contained in them.  


+++



Peace.
Michael Santomauro 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___

From Inconvenient History

 

From Inconvenient History  
A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
  

Churchill, International Jews and the Holocaust: A Revisionist Analysis

Paul Grubach

Copyright 2011

In the interests of fairness, Jeffrey Herf, whose work is here critiqued, was sent the following essay prior to its publication here, and asked to correct any possibly false or misleading statements. No response from Mr. Herf had been received by press time.

 

Introduction

 

Winston Churchill played an important role in the history of the twentieth century. For this reason alone, it is important that revisionists re-examine the beliefs and historical forces that motivated this lionized British icon. By improving our understanding of Churchill's views of and his relationship with the Holocaust and the powerful Jewish groups that played a decisive role in his career, we gain a more accurate view of the past and can use these lessons to hopefully make a more peaceful future for all.

 

This essay is based upon the studies of three well-known Jewish historians, and will focus only upon issues that most mainstream intellectuals ignore or are afraid to deal with. In 1985, Professor Michael J. Cohen published his obscure but well researched academic study, Churchill and the Jews. Churchill's official biographer, Sir Martin Gilbert, published his more widely known Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship in 2007, which inspired a recent Canadian movie documentary. Finally, we will be commenting upon some of the material included in Professor Jeffrey Herf's "Holocaust classic,"The Jewish Enemy, published in 2006.1 

 

Winston Churchill's 1920 article, in which he highlighted the predominant Jewish role in the world-wide communist movement, is pretty well known. What is not discussed is how he misled his readers in essays and books published many years later. In many contemporary academic environments, it is held that the concept of "International Jewry"-groups of powerful Jews who operate on an international basis and feel that the world-wide Jewish community is united by racial bonds-is a "neo-Nazi" and "radically anti-Semitic" canard that should be immediately dismissed. Sir Winston and the British government showed us otherwise. Finally, it may raise the eyebrows of many when they find out what Churchill told the House of Commons in August 1946 about his knowledge of the Holocaust during the war.

 

CONTINUE READING 

 


+++

Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___