Translate

Apr 29, 2015

The Holocaust Debunked Once and for All

Inconvenient History | A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry

Inconvenient History | A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry

Rick Perry: Inequality Not a Problem Because Bible Predicts Poor People

Denial: Hilary Swank and Tom Wilkinson to star in film about Holocaust denier David Irving

Denial: Hilary Swank and Tom Wilkinson to star in film about Holocaust denier David Irving

Tuesday 28 April 2015

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/denial-hilary-swank-and-tom-wilkinson-to-star-in-film-about-holocaust-denier-david-irving-10209745.html


Editor's note: My divorce case had several mentions of David Irving, this will be a the best thing for Holocaust Revisionists, if they have the guts to make the movie with Judge Gray saying:

Judge Gray on the scale of the killing of Jews in the gas chambers: "I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in these proceedings.

Judge Gray on Antisemitism: "I have more sympathy for Irving's argument that Jews are not immune from his criticism. He said that he was simply expressing legitimate criticisms of them. Irving gave as an example what he claimed was his justified criticism of the Jews for suppressing his freedom of expression. Another legitimate ground of criticism might be the manner in which Jews in certain parts of the world appear to exploit the Holocaust. I agree that Jews are as open to criticism as anyone else."

MORE:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial/judgment/extract1.html


--

Hostile New York divorce Judge Matthew Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20: 


+++



Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367

A Sense of Peoplehood Is Not a Pathology

"A race or ethnie without a sense of peoplehood or identity will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies. (Yes, ethnie, not ethnic)." --Michael Santomauro




A Sense of Peoplehood Is Not a Pathology

by Michael Santomauro
IT IS NOT “racist” for a professor such as Alan Dershowitz or for a professor like Kevin MacDonald to advocate for their ethnic group interests.
The words for bigotry that are often used, such as anti-Semiticanti-Whiteanti-Blackanti-Arab, anti-feminist, anti-gay and hundreds of other labels, are for the most part overstated. Instead, [the demonized viewpoints] should be seen as pro-White or pro-Jewish or pro-women or pro-traditional family and should not be considered shameful.
These “pro” sensibilities are part of the human condition, not to be pathologized into an “anti.”
It is about group interests.
A race or ethnie without a sense of peoplehood or identity will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies. (Yes, ethnie, not ethnic).
Our feelings or thoughts of peoplehood are not pathological. They are natural. The European-American will have White ethnic interests and it is not “racist” to have them. Just as Hispanics, Asians, Jews, and Blacks have their own ethnic interests, it should not be considered a pathology for Whites to have them
An ethnie without a sense of peoplehood will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies.
SHARE VIA EMAIL OR SOCIAL MEDIA:
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on VKShare on RedditPrint this page

NHLF_2013 Thaddeus Russell 'A Renegade History of the United States'

Apr 28, 2015

Defamation (english)

Defamation

Defamation 
Documentary film (Complete)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hE5Sr4YdgI

What is anti-Semitism today? In this provocative hour-and-a-half 2009 documentary, Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir travels widely in search of modern manifestations of the "oldest hatred." In this irreverent quest, he talks with professional anti-anti-Semites, and joins a group of young Israelis on a pilgrimage to Auschwitz. His implicit point: Anti-Semitism, at least in Israel and the U.S., is more smoke than fire. Conditioned to see Nazis in every shadow and behind every corner, Shamir suggests, Jews in the U.S. and Israel often manufacture an anti-Semitism that they perversely want to find. 

Tiny House Build Video5

Apr 25, 2015

'' Our Faults Dear Brutus ''

From: joe:  GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com 
Date: Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:58 AM
Subject: '' Our Faults Dear Brutus ''




I sent this to Rabbi Ken Spiro after I saw him on cable give a talk '' Why the Jew ''.
 
joe aka giuseppe
 
 
-
From: joe <giuseppefurioso@aol.com>
To: kenspiro <kenspiro@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 1:59 pm
Subject: '' Our Faults Dear Brutus ''

I caught your talk on TV last night and found it both entertaining and provocative...I'd like to convey a few thoughts that I have on the subject that I hope you will also find both entertaining and provocative. For openers , my name is not really Giuseppe Furioso; I'm compelled to use an alias because if I used my real name to voice my observations and  attitudes about Jews my career as an academic and an official in the Obama Administration would come to a halt immediately. It is  a fact of life that expressing anything critical of Jews is the equivalent of stepping on the ''third rail'' and has been that way since at least  the middle of the last century. For openers, Jews wield enormous power in America and much of the world...this inordinate power is manifest in just about every area of society... economic, political, social, academic. But somehow to merely make what amounts to a statistical observation is regarded as an expression of anti-Semitism. For example while most  media pundits pointed out that the  appointment of Janet Yellin was a milestone in that it represented the first woman to chair the fed, none dared to mention that she was the fourth Jew in a row to hold that position ( fifth if you ignore the one year chairman ship of William Miller in 1978 ) . Jews have held the powerful position of Fed Chair for almost half a century and somehow we are not allowed to notice it. 
  
Your talk was on anti-Semitism and I suspect that you were preaching to the choir or whatever is the jewish equivalent of one. I say  this because of its cheering leading tone...some of the things you asserted could hardly passes muster in a legitimate academic forum of middle schoolers.. For openers you assert that the Jews are completely blameless and therefore anti-Semitism is a totally irrational pathology on the part of the '' goy ''. Well its not , anti Semitism is really the very  rational reaction of people to Jewish behavior and as long as jews insist on behaving in such a fashion there will always be anti-Semitism. Quite simply, if anti-Semitism is a disease, it's a disease that you catch from jews! 
  
For you the bedrock of anti-Semitism is the Christian accusation of deicide...'' the jews killed Jesus  '' . Let me enlighten you on this point, most of the people I correspond with are "anti-Semites" and never have I heard them blame jews for the death of jesus. ( which by the way both Sarah Silverman and the Talmud credit the Jews ) . What incites the ire of every people with whom the jews have dwelled is their supremacist attitude that they are somehow the chosen of god and that they have a divine mission to somehow elevate and enlighten the rest of mankind. Nothing can be further than the truth; Judaism is an evolutionary strategy designed to keep its bloodlines as pure as the English House of Lords...it is collectivist  and seeks to maximize tribal asset acquisition. To this end jews have unleashed a variety of societal plagues that have undermined the cultural cohesion of the nations where they reside. Marxism is a glaring example of this strategy along with Freudianism, Boasian anthropology, feminism, gay rights, multi culturalism and moral relativism. 
  
You say that Jews are the historic  promoters of universal human rights and civil liberties...this will of course be a shock to the Palestinians and the historic victims of the trans Atlantic slave trade.  How can such a claim be reconciled with the Jewish moral code duello...one set of rules for dealing with fellow jews and one for the rest of mankind. 
  
And did it ever occur to you that perhaps the people of the earth might resent a self appointed Jewish moral elite leading them into their vision of the  promised land ? The peoples of the earth , particularly western man has accomplished a great deal without the leadership or assistance of Jewry: the Renaissance, the Age of Exploration, the Scientific Revolution , the Enlightenment , the Industrial Revolution were all accomplished with out jews 
  
And did it ever occur to you that what is '' good for the Jews " may not be good for the peoples with whom they live? in fact these things that jews promote may be downright destructive to the cultural and ethnic integrity of their host nations. e.g Jews in America oppose gun rights but in Israel every jew is armed to the teeth; in America, jews are for open borders, but in Israel it's jews only. And who drove Christmas from the public square? Was it the Moslems ? Perhaps the Hindus ? Maybe the Buddhists? 
  
Perhaps the most abhorrent aspect to Judaism and the most blatant accusation against it be being a promoter of universal human rights is its prohibition against inter marriage. A women faculty member once commented that because of intermarriage , '' the jews were finishing the job that Hitler started ''. The Jewsih equating marriage to a gentile as a form of genocide forfeits any claim to Jewish moral leadership!!!!!. 
  
  
Giuseppe Furioso 
  
 

Apr 24, 2015

They call it a "gate tour", but it's nothing a tour of racism, incitemen...





From Brandon Martinez:
During a monthly march called "Tour of the Gates" which goes through the Arab sections of the Old City of Jerusalem, these religious settlers (most of whom emigrated to Israel/Palestine) proudly chant “mavet la’aravim” (Death to Arabs)! 
You don't see this on any of our news outlets and that is what saddens me most. By definition this is also anti-semitism as well, but this form of anti-semitism (towards Arabs) is the kind that US media turns a blind eye to. The fact that they are escorted by Israeli police, and Arabs have no choice but to close up shops and businesses, and have an enforced curfew keeping them inside during the 1 kilometer long route of the march is sickening.

Apr 23, 2015

American Exceptionalism



We are exceptional...exceptionally lucky: 
 
 We were able  to amass a  territory of several million square miles with only negligible resistance by the few stone age level inhabitants that were already living there. In fact there were hundreds of thousands of square miles upon which no one , white or red, had ever set foot on. This vast territory was gained with a minimum expenditure of blood and treasure. Within its boundaries virtually every crop could be grown , save for a few tropical exotics  and virtually every mineral and metal was found with ease and abundance. We were protected from any would be aggressor by two vast oceans that cost us nothing,  while other nations,  great and small, had to expend considerable treasure to defend their borders with expensive standing armies and fortifications. Our immediate neighbors, Mexico and Canada  never posed  a significant threat. In the case of Mexico , we waged a brief imperialist war that netted territory that rivaled in size  the entire Roman Empire at its height. As for Canada, geopolitically it exists largely as a semi- autonomous republic under American suzerainty.
 
But we are also  exceptional in other ways:
 
Slavery was a legal institution until 1865 when it was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment.
 
Only two nuclear weapons were ever detonated in anger and the United States was responsible for both
 
About two million civilians have been killed by strategic bombing since its inception , the United States is responsible for at least 80% of them
 
We carpet bombed virtually every German and Japanese city in World War ll into rubble and in the post war era we added a few dozen more in Korea , SouthEast Asia and the Middle East .
 
 The United States was the innovator of virtually every weapon of mass destruction since the 1940's: atomic bomb, hydrogen bomb, neutron bomb, nuclear submarines , multiple war heads, stealth air craft , cluster bombs etc
 
We spend more money on our military than the rest of the world combined .
 
We are the world's largest exporter of weapons
 
We  lag behind virtually every industrialized nation in literacy, literacy, life expectancy and infant mortality
 
Our legislatures have incumbency reelection rate that rivals the British House of Lords.
 
We have the Kardashians
 
We have exercised our UN veto in defense of Israel dozens of times while preaching to the world about human rights.
 
We have transferred hundreds of billions of US tax payer dollars to Israel , a racist theocracy , who by any standard is the most dangerous country on the planet.
 
During the Cold War we  supported a variety of mainly third world thugs in the name of anti-communism.
 
We permit our President to target any one any where in the world that he deems a threat to our security..even American citizens. 
 
From:  GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com 
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:31 PM
Subject: American Exceptionalism

Apr 20, 2015

TRIUMPH of RIGHT over wrong, and yes, a true TRIUMPH OF THE WILL!!

Excellent compilation! A wonderful TEACHING TOOL!
This video is a true TRIUMPH of TRUTH over lies, a TRIUMPH of RIGHT over wrong, and yes, a true TRIUMPH OF THE WILL!!

A great step forward in our continuing pursuit of not only honest history, but JUSTICE for those who have been continually wronged for many decades.

My eternal gratitude that I was included among your recipients.

Raymond Goodwin
Proud REVISIONIST - TEXAS


Apr 19, 2015

The Holocaust Debunked Once and for All

It does not get better than this-!!!!!!


Published on Apr 19, 2015

The Holocaust Debunked Once and for All



Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367

The Holocaust Debunked Once and for All





Published on Apr 19, 2015

Apr 18, 2015

The Manning MEMO:

Manning MEMO:

At their meeting, Bush and Blair candidly expressed their doubts that chemical, biological or nuclear weapons would be found in Iraq in the coming weeks, the memo said. The president spoke as if an invasion was unavoidable. The two leaders discussed a timetable for the war, details of the military campaign and plans for the aftermath of the war. The memo also says the president raised three possible ways of provoking a confrontation, including the most controversial:

"The U.S. was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in U.N. colours," the memo says, attributing the idea to Mr. Bush. "If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach".[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning

How to Prosecute George W. Bush for Murder for the Deaths of U.S. Soldie...

Chris Myers interviews OJ Simpson on Up Close

Apr 16, 2015

Israeli soldier : Only Jews walk here

George Galloway debates 100 Zionists at the same time (and wins!) - BBC ...

World Bank Whistleblower makes Startling Confession - Karen Hudes #N3

World Bank Corruption

Part 1: John Lash & Thomas Sheridan Handling Psychopaths Human Predators

RUTH BADER GINSBURG: "Do I think it should be a crime to deny the Holocaust? That is a very difficult question."


RUTH BADER GINSBURG: "Do I think it should be a crime to deny the Holocaust? That is a very difficult question."


Should Holocaust lying be a crime? | Scrapbookpages Blog

--

Hostile Jewish sensibilities is now mainstream in the legal community.

When an ethnocentric Jewish Judge (and the Jewish lawyers) loses  their objectivity, then the truism applies:
Everything is religious, everything is political.

Justice Matthew F. Cooper:  Sending me this about "The Fucking Jews"
Mr. Santomauro: No, actually, it was the opposite of that. It was "Fuck the Arabs" in the essay.
Sandra Schpoont (Attorney for my 11 year old son): Oh, that's better.
Madelyn Jaye:(Attorney for my ex-wife): Oh, that's better.
Steven Mandel (Attorney for my ex-wife): That's better.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Oh, that's better.


Letter from The Mandel Law Firm (Steven J. Mandel) 12-9-13

Hostile New York divorce Judge Matthew Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20: 


+++

My essay in question:

+The Myth of the Innocent Civilian



"Justice Matthew F. Cooper has distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase. In particular, 'Jewish conspiracy' is completely false, in spirit and in word.

"It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Justice Cooper has attempted, perhaps not surprisingly, to justify one smear with another in the same direction.

"Michael Santomauro promotes the ideal of "scientific journalism" – where the underlaying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely in order to avoid these type of distortions. Michael Santomauro treasurse his strong Jewish support  just as he treasures the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share the hope for a just world." --I.S.


Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367

"An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite."--Michael Santomauro. 

Apr 14, 2015

911 WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ?? See with your own eyes

NIST FOIA: Release #25 -- 42A0120 - G25D31, Video #1 (WTC1 Collapse, 10:...

NIST FOIA: Release #25 -- 42A0120 - G25D31, Video #1 (WTC1 Collapse, 10:...

9 11 Actual crash footage of 2nd plane

Jewish sensibilities is now mainstream in the legal community.

Jewish sensibilities is now mainstream in the legal community.

When an ethnocentric Jewish Judge (and the Jewish lawyers) loses  their objectivity, then the truism applies:
Everything is religious, everything is political.

Justice Matthew F. Cooper:  Sending me this about "The Fucking Jews"
Mr. Santomauro: No, actually, it was the opposite of that. It was "Fuck the Arabs" in the essay.
Sandra Schpoont (Attorney for my 11 year old son): Oh, that's better.
Madelyn Jaye:(Attorney for my ex-wife): Oh, that's better.
Steven Mandel (Attorney for my ex-wife): That's better.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Oh, that's better.


Letter from The Mandel Law Firm (Steven J. Mandel) 12-9-13

New York divorce Judge Matthew Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20: 


+++

My essay in question:

+The Myth of the Innocent Civilian



"Justice Matthew F. Cooper has distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase. In particular, 'Jewish conspiracy' is completely false, in spirit and in word.

"It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Justice Cooper has attempted, perhaps not surprisingly, to justify one smear with another in the same direction.

"Michael Santomauro promotes the ideal of "scientific journalism" – where the underlaying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely in order to avoid these type of distortions. Michael Santomauro treasurse his strong Jewish support  just as he treasures the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share the hope for a just world." --I.S.


Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367


"An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite."--Michael Santomauro. 

Scene from - "9/11: SIMULATIONS" - "Flight 175"

Jews Against Hillary Clinton - Part 1 - Iran

Apr 11, 2015

The Frost Interview - Munib al-Masri: 'The spring is coming'

The Frost Interview - Munib al-Masri: 'The spring is coming'

Nixon with no expletives deleted

Radio 3Fourteen Censored by Apple's iTunes

A friend of my mother, who survived the Holocaust by posing as a Pole, came close to inadvertently revealing herself by the way she mopped the floor.

A friend of my mother, who survived the Holocaust by posing as a Pole, came close to inadvertently revealing herself by the way she mopped the floor. 
Working as a cleaning woman in Nazi headquarters, she would mop the room from the far corner to the door so that she would not have to walk back over the newly cleaned floor. When her fellow cleaning women, who were used to mopping themselves into a corner, noticed this, they exclaimed, ``Oh Wanda, you work just like a Jew." 

by Jonathan Rosenblum
Jerusalem Post Int'l Edition
January 11, 2002

http://www.jewishmediaresources.com/article/295/

Bill and Hilary Clinton block a major film on 9/11 TRUTH

1 DAY BEFORE 911 WTC Attacks, An Amazing Thing Happened

Apr 4, 2015

Newly Wed Humor: Urban or Suburban

Dumb Blonde On Newlyweds Game Show Doesn't Know Urban!

I love Easter

I love Easter, I do, but I got to be honest man, tomorrow, we nail his ass back onto the cross for another 364 gosh darn days before we bring him down again. Am I right? Tell me, am I right? Yea I know I'm right.

Ahmadinejad's Holocaust Problems are My Holocaust Problems

September 2007

Ahmadinejad's Holocaust Problems are My Holocaust Problems 
From Michael Santomauro, another great article following the Zundel theme. One of my most enjoyable extracurricular activities is putting people straight on what the President of Iran actually said. "The Imam said the regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the pages of time." not "we must wipe Israel off the map". The Zionist Scum fears one thing above all others - that their lies will be exposed to the majority of humanity. Even the majority of Jews do not understand the truth, they are as much victims as anyone else. The ZioFasicsts think they are secure in their control of everything people see and hear, that's why there is this movement to create Internet2. They must control the flow of information because their story is so full of holes that it cannot handle scrutiny. Anyway, regardless of anything that happened in history, the treatment of Palestinians TODAY is an affront to humanity and not justifiable under any circumstances. Blowing innocent Palestinian babies up with an Apache gunship or F16 jet is not a defensive act, nor by the way is bulldozing their house while they are still in it!
START:
The Holocaust consists of three basic elements: (1) Approximately six million Jews were deliberately killed. (2) These killings were part of a state sponsored program on the part of the Third Reich whose ultimate goal was the total eradication of the Jewish people. (3) The bulk of these murders took place in special death camps where the principal mechanism of execution was the homicidal gas chamber that utilized Zyclon B, a commercial pesticide whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide.

That the Third Reich possessed the technological and administrative means to carry out such a vast amount of killing there is little doubt. The Soviet Union with significantly inferior assets in these areas was able to kill far greater numbers of human beings. Furthermore, the armies of the Third Reich succeeded in killing at least ten million of its heavily armed military opponents in the course of World War II. Hence the killing of six million unarmed civilians should not have presented any unique problems to such an industrially advanced and bureaucratically efficient state as Nazi Germany, on the contrary, it would have been far easier.

My doubts about the Holocaust are not centered on whether it could have happened but whether it did happen. In fact many of the doubts that I have are a direct consequence of the fact that I have no doubt that it actually could have happened...but certainly not in the ways that have been described thus far in the ''official'' literature.

It is part of the Western tradition in legal, scientific and intellectual matters that those asserting something have the burden of proof and that those who disagree are not required to provide evidence. This tradition however has been turned on its head regarding the Holocaust since the ''historical truth'' of the Holocaust has been posited in advance. 

Furthermore, even to express doubts can result in criminal penalties in at least 11 so-called democratic countries and the ruining of lives and careers in numerous others.

Listed below are some of the ''problems '' I have with the Holocaust. Should these be cleared up it would go a long way toward my accepting it they are in no particular order.

1) Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew they got there hands on? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews survived even longer. Most of these ''survivors'' were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could have exploited for their war effort. There was no logical reason for them to be kept alive. The very existence of more than a million survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the basic components of the Holocaust i.e. that the Germans had a policy to eliminate every Jew they got their hands on.

2) Why is their no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill's six volume History of the Second World War or the wartime memoirs of either De Gaulle or Eisenhower or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War. Keep in mind all these were written years after the war ended and thus after the Holocaust had been allegedly proven by the Nuremberg Trials? With regard to the Holocaust, the silence of these " cognoscenti " is deafening!

3) What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if in fact it was a death camp?

4) Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far flung empire, thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while fighting a world war on two fronts to deliver people to ''death camps'' hundreds of miles away who were then executed upon arrival wouldn't a bullet on the spot have appealed to legendary German sense of efficiency?

5) Why after sixty years have historians been unable to come up with a single German document that points to a Holocaust? Should we believe the likes of Raul Hilberg that in the place of written orders there was an "incredible meeting of the minds" by the literally tens of thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude.

Prof. Hilberg's exact quote:
"But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy."

Let us note again those final words: "an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy."

6) How come it is still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from an immediate post war figure of 3 million, to a figure of somewhat less than one million? 

Why do many respond to this observation by saying, " what's the difference whether it's six million or one million''. The answer is that the difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can get you three years in an Austrian jail...just ask British historian David Irving!

7) All of Germany's wartime codes were compromised including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore it has been insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when discussing their extermination program of the Jews e.g. final solution, special treatment, resettlement, etc. Why was it necessary for them to use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies?

8) The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of thousands of victims untenable.

9) Initially claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the old Reich e.g. Dachau, Bergen-Belsen. ''Evidence'' to that effect was every bit as compelling as what was offered for other camps, located in occupied Poland, yet without explanation in the early sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the ''death camps'' were located in the East i.e. Poland outside (some would say conveniently) of the probing eyes of western scholars.

10) No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that personnel entered the gas chambers after twenty minutes without any protective gear and the fact that Zyclon B was a "time release" fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another twenty-four hours. And that even after twenty-four hours the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill anyone who touched them who were not wearing protective gear.

11) Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap, lamp shades and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews? Could it be that in the light of modern forensics and DNA knowledge these claims are totally untenable?

12) Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special grids ''evidence'' of this was presented at Nurembergevidence that sent men to the gallows.

14) Elie Wiesel has been described as "the Apostle of Remembrance" yet in his memoir, Night which deals with his stay at Auschwitz he makes no mention of the now infamous homicidal gas chambers. Isn't this a bit like one of the Gospels making no mention of the Cross?

15) Virtually every survivor who was examined at Auschwitz says that he or she was examined by the infamous Dr. Mengele.

16) According to survivor testimony, hundreds of thousands of Jews were executed at Treblinka and then buried in mass graves in the surrounding area. Why is it that extensive sonar probing of these burial grounds reveals that this alleged final resting place for Holocaust victims has remained undisturbed since at least the last ice age?

17) ''Proof'' of the Holocaust rest primarily on survivor testimony; there's little if any hard evidence. The best of this has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as merely ''criminal traces''. Even Judge Grey who presided at the Irving-Lipstadt Trial commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was "extremely thin". To paraphrase Prof. Arthur Butz of Northwestern University, ''a crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence ''where is it? There was more hard evidence against OJ Simpson at his trial and he was FOUND INNOCENT!

18) Why has Holocaust Revisionism been criminalized in at least eleven countries? What other historic truth needs the threat of prison or the destruction of one's career to maintain itself. Should someone be sent to prison for expressing skepticism about the official Chinese claim that they suffered thirty-five million dead in World War II.

19) Why do the court historians insist that "denying the Holocaust" is like denying slavery or saying the earth is flat when it is nothing of the sort. The leading Revisionists are first rate scholars who hold advanced degrees from the world's leading universities. Is there anyone comparable among those who say the world is flat or that slavery never existed?

20) Promoters of the Holocaust have expressed concerns about the remembering the Holocaust once the last survivors die. Why haven't Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959?

21) Survivors of the Holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the crematoriums as they consumed the bodies of murdered victims - some eyewitnesses even claimed they could detect national origins by the color of the smoke. How can this be reconciled with the fact that properly operating crematoriums do not produce smoke of any color?

22) According to the official version of the Holocaust hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were rounded up in mid 1944 and sent to Auschwitz where most were gassed immediately upon arrival and their bodies were disposed of by burning in huge open air pits using railroad ties and gasoline. Why is that there is no evidence of these huge funerary pyres in the high resolution surveillance photos taken by Allied aircraft who were over flying the camp on a daily basis during this time period. Furthermore, why have no remains been found, since open pit burning, even when gasoline is used, generates insufficient heat to totally consume a body?

23) All of the liberated camps were littered with corpses; is there a single autopsy report or any other forensic evidence that shows that even a single one of these deaths was a consequence of poison gas?

24) The death toll for the Holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by Jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were "missing" at the end of the war? ANSWER: Yes and No! WHY? You can go to jail in Israel and 11 European nations if you do such research and have a different answer. I am not kidding! Ask the Max Planck scientist Germar Rudolf. (Do Google search for imprisoned THOUGHT CRIMINAL Germar Rudolf).

25) Why do the wartime inspection reports of camps made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions - it strains credulity that such monumental crimes could be hidden. The only explanations are that either these crimes were not occurring or that the Red Cross was complicit in a cover up.

26) Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter Report?

27) "The Holocaust was technologically possible because it happened ". Why is this intellectually bankrupt argument, which turns scholarship on its head, considered by the promoters of the Holocaust as historical truth, considered a sufficient response to the mounting Revisionist evidence to the contrary?

Note for item 27: "34 reputable historians" in 1979 paid and published an advertisement in Le Monde one of the most monumental pieces of nonsense of French academic life:
"It is not necessary to ask oneself how, technically, such a mass murder was possible. It was technically possible because it happened."

28) What other historical truths rely to the extent that the Holocaust does on so-called "eye witness" testimony-and why have none of these witnesses ever been cross examined?

29) According to the official version of the Holocaust, the Jews remained ignorant of their fate until the very end so skillful were their Nazis murderers in deceiving their victims. How can this ignorance be reconciled with the fact that the Jews have historically been as a group, the most literate and highly informed people on the planet with legendary access to the highest echelons of government.

Peace is patriotic.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367

What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

Professor F. Littell has said: "You can't discuss the truth of the holocaust. That is a distortion of the concept of free speech. The United States should emulate Germany, which outlaws such exercises." --Mind-boggling! Don't you think?

Paul Eisen: What happened to Joel Hayward and how long are we ...

Paul Eisen: What happened to Joel Hayward and how long are we ...: A few weeks ago I posted The Hayward Thesis   and remarked that it was my favourite Holocaust revisionist text. I also mentioned that, u...

Paul Eisen: Is Max Blumenthal an imbecile?

Paul Eisen: Is Max Blumenthal an imbecile?: I saw the original on Mondoweiss  (Do not miss it, certainly the video but also the bit where Blumenthal is described as 'a special c...

AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know

The Death of American Democracy

9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory

The Legend of 9/11 — 10 Years On

They Are Going To Kill Troy Davis

Troy Davis to be Killed

Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?

September Clues - Busted! November 2007 (moved from Google Video)

International Bureau of Double Standards—The CNN/Iran File

The Road to Rio with Voiceover

American Democracy — The Funeral

Jewish Peer Attacks Violinist for Israel Apartheid Remark

Holocaust, Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid? — Updated

Another War for Israel — Featuring America's Newest Allies: al Qaida